Institutions, Candidates, and the Rhetoric of Personalism: Evidence from Latin America

Published in Representation (2026).

Abstract

Personalistic leadership has long shaped democratic competition, yet we know little about how institutional contexts condition candidates’ reliance on personal appeals. We argue that institutionalized party competition reduces candidates’ incentives to rely on personalist rhetoric. Where parties provide stronger collective anchors, self-centered appeals become less attractive; where those anchors are weak, candidates can more easily mobilize through personal visibility. To test this argument, we analyze over 40,000 X posts from 131 presidential candidates across 17 Latin American countries from 2010 to 2022, linking text-based measures of personalist rhetoric to V-Dem and V-Party indicators of institutionalization and party organization. Candidates in more institutionalized systems use significantly less personalist rhetoric, while party-level results vary across organizational mechanisms. Such appeals enhance voter attention only where institutional constraints are weak. The study reconceptualizes personalism as an electoral strategy and provides new comparative evidence on how institutions shape leader-centered politics.

Access and citation

Resource	Link
Published version	Representation
Full text	Download PDF
Supplementary material	Download PDF
Google Scholar	View results

Replication materials

Data and code are available in the Harvard Dataverse replication package.